Encryption quotes

Welcome to our collection of quotes on Encryption! Encryption plays a crucial role in our ever-connected digital world, ensuring the privacy and security of our sensitive information. As technology advances, encryption becomes increasingly essential in protecting our data from unauthorized access and cyber threats.

Throughout history, encryption has been employed in various forms, allowing individuals, organizations, and governments to safeguard their communications and valuable data. From ancient cryptographic techniques like the Caesar cipher to modern-day algorithms such as RSA and AES, encryption has evolved to meet the growing demands of securing information in the digital age.

Within this category, you'll find a diverse range of insightful quotes on encryption from renowned cryptographers, computer scientists, privacy advocates, and pioneers in the field of cybersecurity. These quotes explore the significance of encryption in preserving privacy, defending against cyberattacks, and maintaining the integrity of our online world.

So, whether you're interested in the technical aspects of encryption or you simply appreciate the importance of protecting digital privacy, dive into our collection of quotes on encryption and explore the words of wisdom from those who understand the critical role encryption plays in our modern society.

Matt Blaze
Matt Blaze
Researcher in cryptography
On balance, the use of encryption, just like the use of good locks on doors, has the net effect of preventing a lot more crime than it might assist.
Matt Blaze
Matt Blaze
Researcher in cryptography
It may be true that encryption makes certain investigations of crime more difficult. It can close down certain investigative techniques or make it harder to get access to certain kinds of electronic evidence. But it also prevents crime by making our computers, our infrastructure, our medical records, our financial records, more robust against criminals. It prevents crime.
Matt Blaze
Matt Blaze
Researcher in cryptography
Clipper took a relatively simple problem, encryption between two phones, and turned it into a much more complex problem, encryption between two phones but that can be decrypted by the government under certain conditions and, by making the problem that complicated, that made it very easy for subtle flaws to slip by unnoticed. I think it demonstrated that this problem is not just a tough public policy problem, but it's also a tough technical problem.
Matt Blaze
Matt Blaze
Researcher in cryptography
There's been a certain amount of opportunism in the wake of the Paris attacks in 2015, when there was almost a reflexive assumption that, "Oh, if only we didn't have strong encryption out there, these attacks could have been prevented." But, as more evidence has come out - and we don't know all the facts yet - we're seeing very little to support the idea that the Paris attackers were making any kind of use of encryption.
Matt Blaze
Matt Blaze
Researcher in cryptography
What encryption lets us do is say, "Yes, the Internet is insecure." Bad guys are able to compromise computers everywhere, but we're able to tolerate that because if they do intercept our messages, they can't do any harm with it.
Matt Blaze
Matt Blaze
Researcher in cryptography
So, in 1993, in what was probably the first salvo of the first Crypto War, there was concern coming from the National Security Agency and the FBI that encryption would soon be incorporated into lots of communications devices, and that that would cause wiretaps to go dark. There was not that much commercial use of encryption at that point. Encryption, particularly for communications traffic, was mostly something done by the government.
Matt Blaze
Matt Blaze
Researcher in cryptography
From a policymaker's point of view, [the back door] must look like a perfect solution. "We'll hold onto a separate copy of the keys, and we'll try to keep them really, really safe so that only in an emergency and if it's authorized by a court will we bring out those keys and use them." And, from a policy point of view, when you describe it that way, who could be against that?
Matt Blaze
Matt Blaze
Researcher in cryptography
We basically have only two real tried and true techniques that can help counter this. One of them is to make systems as simple as we can, and there are limits to that because we can only simplify things so much. The other is the use of encryption.
Matt Blaze
Matt Blaze
Researcher in cryptography
If we try to prohibit encryption or discourage it or make it more difficult to use, we're going to suffer the consequences that will be far reaching and very difficult to reverse, and we seem to have realized that in the wake of the September 11th attacks. To the extent there is any reason to be hopeful, perhaps that's where we'll end up here.